 |
By Gary R. Thornton, SPHR, CEBS
The workplace today is very different from a decade
ago, for employees hold in their mortal hands, the power to abolish
all forms of their employer's prior success. We continually experience
and read of a workplace filled with violence, drugs and theft. With
this angst and anxiety in our workforce, it is becoming more important
than ever that in-depth background checks be required for prospective
employees.
Options for determining an applicant's "fitness"
for duty could include the following background investigation:
- Work references
- Academic verification
- Credit checks
- Drug and alcohol screens
- Psychological profiling
Individuals with problem backgrounds work
in every industry in this country. As a result criminal background
checks are a selection device that is becoming more and more common
as a result of increased access to information, and increased liability
for failure to tap into that information. The Concept of "Negligent
Hiring" makes an employer liable for damages to a third party by an
employee, if the employer knew OR should have known,
based on an employee's background, that the employee posed a risk
to a third party. (The laws vary from state to state with respect
to the privileged nature of criminal records. Although there are a
number of states that have no restrictions on employer access to criminal
conviction records (e.g., Texas, Maine, West Virginia, and Wyoming),
many states require employers to petition for such information from
state repositories for criminal record information, the state police,
or local law enforcement agencies. The right of access is not absolute;
there may be a standard that the employer must meet to get criminal
record information about an applicant).
In Holden v. Hotel Management Inc., a jury awarded
$1 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages
to a man whose wife was murdered by a hotel employee. The hotel
management company, against whom the claim was levied, failed to
conduct pre-employment screening and reference checking that would
have revealed the murderer's violent history. Traditionally, employer
liability allows recovery for workers' wrongful and criminal acts
when they occur on the job. Companies may also be
liable for offenses committed when an employee is not "on the clock."
Employers are on firm legal ground as long as
their investigation and inquiries comply with applicable laws, such
as:
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Equal Employment Opportunity Act
- Title 7 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act.
PROS for conducting Background Checks:
Hiring better workers with the implementation of pre-employment background
checks ensures insulation from negligent hiring and retention lawsuits
as well as:
- Lower hiring costs
- Reduced turnover
- Protection of assets and the firm's name
- Shielding of employees, customers and the
public from theft, violence, drugs and harassment
CONS for conducting Background Checks:
Risks of conducting background checks include:
- Expense in checking criminal backgrounds
- Time spent in checking can cause loss of applicants
- Limited access to records
- Legal limits on use of records uncovered
- Inaccuracies such as mistaken identity can
result in unfair or undesirable rejection of a quality candidate
Every company, regardless of size, should run
applicant background checks. Thirty percent of new business failures
are caused by employee theft or embezzlement. Internal theft is
15 times more prevalent than external theft. More than 2 million
personal thefts happen annually in the workplace. Seven percent
of rapes, 8 percent of robberies, and 16 percent of assaults occur
at work. (Source: Society for Human Resource Management Fall
1999)
If companies still are not sure that pre-employment
background checks are important, consider the nonsensical acts of
workplace violence that have occurred in our own backyard. Incidents
at Edgewater Technology in Wakefield, MA where allegedly a co-worker
murdered seven co-workers in one of the most horrific workplace
acts of violence and in Bennington, VT where a disgruntled former
employee returned to her former workplace and committed random acts
of murder against her former co-workers. These employers now speak
from a perspective the rest of us hope never to experience.
Gary R. Thornton, MBA, SPHR, CEBS, RPA, GBA is the Principal of Thornton & Associates, a human resources management consulting firm located in Scarborough, ME. He has more than 25 years’ experience in human resource management for both private and nonprofit organizations. He holds credentials as a Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR), Certified Employee Benefits Specialist (CEBS), Retirement Plan Associate (RPA) and Group Benefit Associate (GBA). He currently serves as a Special Expertise Panel Member - Total Rewards, Compensation & Benefits for the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). He has also held leadership roles in the Maine Employee Benefits Council and the Human Resources Association of Southern Maine. For more information about the information contained in this article, you may contact him at 207-885-9333 or email gthorn@ThorntonAndAssociates.net
|